{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-71","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-71)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-25","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:c9e868","proof":"sha256:95160c2ecc22d2857936c3264e531674815c3dafe95448f8dcf53f2a7a8f6c37","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"AD 2004 nr 71, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-ad-2004-71","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-71","inLanguage":"sv","about":"Fråga om det allmänna skadeståndets storlek","abstract":["Vad som hände: En arbetstagarorganisation har åsidosatt den i 45 § medbestämmandelagen föreskrivna varselskyldigheten genom att utvidga en pågående stridsåtgärd utan att skriftligen varsla motparten minst sju arbetsdagar i förväg.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2004."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-71","softwareVersion":"7a470db43dfeff55","citation":"avgorande-ad-2004-71, AD 2004 nr 71, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-71 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:172ac98a17f8b146, bygge legal-2026-09-25).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2004-71/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:95160c2ecc22d2857936c3264e531674815c3dafe95448f8dcf53f2a7a8f6c37","version":"legal-2026-09-25","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-25+legal-2026-09-25+2026-09-25T21:24:40","content_hash":"sha256:95160c2ecc22d2857936c3264e531674815c3dafe95448f8dcf53f2a7a8f6c37","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T03:41:39.221Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-71","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2004-71/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}