{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-11-02","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:f6410a","proof":"sha256:dc84900ece92494a03f31f45046b54abdb694cb9d4eb2ac8208173be6513e9de","jurisdiction":"eu","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","item":{"schema_version":"1.0.0","id":"eu:m-l-c-52-25","jurisdiction":"eu","lang":"en","brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","brand":{"product":"NovaCopilot","platform":"ExploreWorldAI","infrastructure":"ExploreWorld Legal","infrastructure_url":"legal.exploreworldai.com","legal_entity":"Valkiv Ventures AB","permanent_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/novacopilot","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","powered_by":"Powered by NovaCopilot","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/licensvillkor"},"sections":[{"title":"Provisional text","paragraphs":[]},{"title":"JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)","paragraphs":[]},{"title":"21 May 2026 ( * )","paragraphs":["para_4"]},{"title":"In Joined Cases C‑52/25 [Binanrier] ( i ) and C‑53/25 [Beaudeluc],  i","paragraphs":["para_6","para_7","para_8","para_9"]},{"title":"UI (C‑53/25)","paragraphs":["para_11","para_12","para_13","para_14","para_15","para_16","para_17","para_18","para_19","para_20","para_21","para_22"]},{"title":"Judgment","paragraphs":["para_24","para_25"]},{"title":"Legal context","paragraphs":[]},{"title":"European Union law","paragraphs":["para_28","para_29","para_30","para_31","para_32","para_33"]},{"title":"4         Article 3 of that regulation, entitled ‘Conditions for exemption’, provided:","paragraphs":["para_35","para_36","para_37","para_38","para_39","para_40"]},{"title":"Belgian law","paragraphs":["para_42","para_43","para_44","para_45","para_46","para_47","para_48","para_49","para_50","para_51","para_52","para_53","para_54","para_55","para_56"]},{"title":"Consideration of the questions referred","paragraphs":[]},{"title":"The first and second questions","paragraphs":["para_59","para_60","para_61","para_62","para_63","para_64","para_65","para_66","para_67","para_68","para_69"]},{"title":"The third question","paragraphs":["para_71","para_72","para_73","para_74","para_75","para_76","para_77","para_78","para_79","para_80","para_81","para_82"]},{"title":"Costs","paragraphs":["para_84"]},{"title":"On those grounds, the Court (Sixth Chamber) hereby rules:","paragraphs":["para_86","para_87"]},{"title":"2.       Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014","paragraphs":["para_89","para_90","para_91","para_92"]}],"paragraphs":[{"text":"Provisional text","paragraph_id":"para_1"},{"text":"JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)","paragraph_id":"para_2"},{"text":"21 May 2026 ( * )","paragraph_id":"para_3"},{"text":"( Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Block exemption for certain types of aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – Aid intended to compensate for damage caused by adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to a natural disaster – Reduction of th …","paragraph_id":"para_4"},{"text":"In Joined Cases C‑52/25 [Binanrier] ( i ) and C‑53/25 [Beaudeluc],  i","paragraph_id":"para_5"},{"text":"TWO REQUESTS for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the cour d’appel de Mons (Court of Appeal, Mons, Belgium), made by decisions of 21 January 2025, received at the Court on 28 January 2025, in the proceedings","paragraph_id":"para_6"},{"text":"RZ,","paragraph_id":"para_7"},{"text":"GT (C‑52/25),","paragraph_id":"para_8"},{"text":"AX,","paragraph_id":"para_9"},{"text":"UI (C‑53/25)","paragraph_id":"para_10"},{"text":"v","paragraph_id":"para_11"},{"text":"Région wallonne,","paragraph_id":"para_12"},{"text":"THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),","paragraph_id":"para_13"},{"text":"composed of A. Kumin, acting as President of the Chamber, S. Gervasoni and M. Bošnjak (Rapporteur), Judges,","paragraph_id":"para_14"},{"text":"Advocate General: A. Biondi,","paragraph_id":"para_15"},{"text":"Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,","paragraph_id":"para_16"},{"text":"having regard to the written procedure,","paragraph_id":"para_17"},{"text":"after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:","paragraph_id":"para_18"},{"text":"–        the Belgian Government, by P. Cottin, C. Pochet and M. Van Regemorter, acting as Agents, and by X. Drion, avocat,","paragraph_id":"para_19"},{"text":"–        the European Commission, by A. Bouquet, C. Kovács and S. Verschraegen, acting as Agents,","paragraph_id":"para_20"},{"text":"after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 15 January 2026,","paragraph_id":"para_21"},{"text":"gives the following","paragraph_id":"para_22"},{"text":"Judgment","paragraph_id":"para_23"},{"text":"1         These requests for a preliminary ruling concern the interpretation of Article 25(9) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 of 25 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 [TFEU] (OJ 2014 L 193, p. 1).","paragraph_id":"para_24"},{"text":"2         The requests have been made in two sets of proceedings between, first, RZ and GT (Case C‑52/25) and, secondly, AX and UI (Case C‑53/25), farmers, and the Région wallonne (Belgium) concerning compensation for damage suffered as a result of a drought.","paragraph_id":"para_25"},{"text":"Legal context","paragraph_id":"para_26"},{"text":"European Union law","paragraph_id":"para_27"},{"text":"3         Recitals 10, 42 and 54 of Regulation No 702/2014, in force at the material time and replaced since then, were worded as follows:","paragraph_id":"para_28"},{"text":"‘(10)      The general conditions for the application of this Regulation should be defined on the basis of a set of common principles that ensure that the aid serves a purpose of common interest, has a clear incentive effect, is appropriate and proportionate, is granted in full transparency and subject to a control mechanism and regular evaluation, and does not adversely affect trading conditions to extent that is contrary to the common interest.","paragraph_id":"para_29"},{"text":"…","paragraph_id":"para_30"},{"text":"(42)      Those categories of aid should in particular encompass … risk and crisis management aid such as aid to compensate for losses caused by adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to a natural disaster … That aid should be especially aimed at enhancing the competitiveness and the viability of the whole agricultural sector.","paragraph_id":"para_31"},{"text":"…","paragraph_id":"para_32"},{"text":"(54)      Good risk and crisis management is a key tool for a sustainable and competitive agricultural sector. Primary agricultural production is exposed to particular natural, climatic and health risks and crises. Therefore, risk and crisis management aid and the aid for the livestock sector should …","paragraph_id":"para_33"},{"text":"4         Article 3 of that regulation, entitled ‘Conditions for exemption’, provided:","paragraph_id":"para_34"},{"text":"‘Aid schemes, individual aid granted under aid schemes and ad hoc aid shall be compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(2) or (3) [TFEU] and shall be exempted from the notification requirement of Article 108(3) [TFEU] provided that such aid fulfils all the conditions laid down in Chapter I of this Regulation, as well as the specific conditions for the relevant category of aid laid down in Chapter III of this Regulation.’","paragraph_id":"para_35"},{"text":"5         Article 25 of that regulation, entitled ‘Aid to compensate for damage caused by adverse climatic event which can be assimilated to a natural disaster’, provided:","paragraph_id":"para_36"},{"text":"‘1.      Aid to compensate SMEs active in the primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which can be assimilated to a natural disaster shall be compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) [TFEU] and shall be exempted from the notification requirement of Article 108(3) thereof where it fulfils the conditions laid down in paragraphs 2 to 10 of this Article and in Chapter I.","paragraph_id":"para_37"},{"text":"…","paragraph_id":"para_38"},{"text":"9.      Aid granted under this Article shall be reduced by 50% unless it is granted to beneficiaries who have taken out insurance covering at least 50% of their average annual production or production-related income and the statistically most frequent climatic risks in the Member State or region concerned for which insurance coverage is provided.","paragraph_id":"para_39"},{"text":"…’","paragraph_id":"para_40"},{"text":"Belgian law","paragraph_id":"para_41"},{"text":"6         Article 6 of the arrêté du gouvernement wallon, du 23 août 2018, considérant comme une calamité agricole la sécheresse d’août 2016 à juin 2017, délimitant l’étendue géographique de cette calamité et déterminant l’indemnisation des dommages (order of the Walloon Government considering the d …","paragraph_id":"para_42"},{"text":"‘For the purposes of compensation, the amounts resulting from the application of Article [5] shall be reduced by 50% if the claimant has not taken out insurance covering at least 50% of his or her production against climatic risks.’","paragraph_id":"para_43"},{"text":"The disputes in the main proceedings, the questions referred for a preliminary ruling and the procedure before the Court of Justice","paragraph_id":"para_44"},{"text":"7         The applicants in the main proceedings, whose agricultural holdings consist of permanent and temporary pastures and grassland intended for feeding livestock, suffered damage during periods of drought which took place between August 2016 and June 2017. By the order of 23 August 2018, the Wa …","paragraph_id":"para_45"},{"text":"8         On 31 October 2018, the Governor of the Province of Luxembourg (Belgium) made a proposal for compensation in an amount reduced by 50%, pursuant to Article 6 of the order of 23 August 2018, on the ground that the applicants in the main proceedings had not taken out insurance covering at least 50% of their production against climatic risks.","paragraph_id":"para_46"},{"text":"9         The applicants in the main proceedings challenged the validity of that proposal, arguing that the insurance available in Belgium did not offer the possibility of covering agricultural holdings against the risk of drought. By two decisions of 10 December 2018, the Governor of the Province of Luxembourg nevertheless awarded compensation to the applicants in the main proceedings in an amount reduced by 50%.","paragraph_id":"para_47"},{"text":"10       By two judgments of 15 March 2021, the cour d’appel de Liège (Court of Appeal, Liège, Belgium) dismissed the applicants’ appeal against those two decisions, on the ground that Article 6 of the order of 23 August 2018 is consistent with Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014, pursuant to wh …","paragraph_id":"para_48"},{"text":"11       By judgments of 19 January 2023, the Cour de cassation (Court of Cassation, Belgium) set aside those two judgments on the ground that the cour d’appel de Liège (Court of Appeal, Liège) had not taken account of the argument of the applicants in the main proceedings that it had been impossible for them to take out insurance against hail, since that insurance did not cover damage caused to permanent and temporary pastures.","paragraph_id":"para_49"},{"text":"12       The cases were referred back to the cour d’appel de Mons (Court of Appeal, Mons, Belgium), which is the referring court. Before that court, the applicants in the main proceedings claim, first, that, in Belgium, at the time when the droughts in question took place, it was not possible to ins …","paragraph_id":"para_50"},{"text":"13       The referring court is uncertain as to the scope of Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 and whether Article 6 of the order of 23 August 2018 is consistent with that provision. In that regard, it observes that Article 6 does not take into account the fact that a claimant may not have bee …","paragraph_id":"para_51"},{"text":"14       In those circumstances, the cour d’appel de Mons (Court of Appeal, Mons), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:","paragraph_id":"para_52"},{"text":"‘(1)      Does Article 25(9) of [Regulation No 702/2014], providing that aid to compensate SMEs active in the primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which can be assimilated to a natural disaster … is to be reduced by 50% unless it is granted to beneficiaries …","paragraph_id":"para_53"},{"text":"(2)      Does the reduction provided for in that article apply if the aid is intended to compensate farmers for damage caused by a climatic event considered to be a natural disaster (in this case, drought) which is not one of the climatic risks for which insurance cover is available in the Member St …","paragraph_id":"para_54"},{"text":"(3)      Does that article allow the Member State concerned not to reduce the aid intended to compensate farmers for damage caused by a climatic event considered to be a natural disaster, where the aid beneficiary demonstrates that the type of production in which he or she engages (in this case, per …","paragraph_id":"para_55"},{"text":"15       By decision of the President of the Court of 24 February 2025, Cases C‑52/25 and C‑53/25 were joined for the purposes of the written procedure and the judgment.","paragraph_id":"para_56"},{"text":"Consideration of the questions referred","paragraph_id":"para_57"},{"text":"The first and second questions","paragraph_id":"para_58"},{"text":"16       By its first and second questions, which it is appropriate to examine together, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that aid intended to compensate an SME active in primary agricultural production for damage ca …","paragraph_id":"para_59"},{"text":"17       In accordance with Article 25(1) of Regulation No 702/2014, aid to compensate SMEs active in primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which can be assimilated to a natural disaster is to be compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Artic …","paragraph_id":"para_60"},{"text":"18       The provisions thus referred to include Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014, pursuant to which aid granted under that article is to be reduced by 50% unless it is granted to beneficiaries who have taken out insurance covering at least 50% of their average annual production or production-related income and the statistically most frequent climatic risks in the Member State or region concerned for which insurance coverage is provided.","paragraph_id":"para_61"},{"text":"19       In order to answer the questions referred, it must be borne in mind that, in accordance with settled case-law, in interpreting a provision of EU law, it is necessary to consider not only its wording, but also the context in which it occurs and the objectives pursued by the rules of which it is part (see, to that effect, judgment of 13 November 2025, JYSK , C‑117/24, EU:C:2025:872, paragraph 23 and the case-law cited).","paragraph_id":"para_62"},{"text":"20       As regards the wording of Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014, that provision states that the aid granted under that article is, in principle, to be reduced by 50% unless the beneficiary has taken out insurance covering ‘at least 50% of their average annual production or production-related income’ and, with respect to the definition of the risks covered, ‘the statistically most frequent climatic risks in the Member State or region concerned …’.","paragraph_id":"para_63"},{"text":"21       That provision thus sets out the two cumulative conditions which the insurance taken out by the beneficiary of the aid must satisfy if that aid is not to be reduced by 50%. No reference is made in that provision to the climatic risk which actually caused the damage giving rise to the grant …","paragraph_id":"para_64"},{"text":"22       That interpretation is entirely consistent with the objective pursued by Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014.","paragraph_id":"para_65"},{"text":"23       As is apparent from recital 54 of that regulation, aid for making good losses caused by adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to natural disasters is in line with good risk and crisis management and is intended to help SMEs facing particular difficulties despite having undertaken …","paragraph_id":"para_66"},{"text":"24       The objective of the reduction provided for in Article 25(9) of that regulation is thus to encourage SMEs active in primary agricultural production to take out insurance covering the climatic risks to which they are statistically most exposed. By making the grant of the full amount of the a …","paragraph_id":"para_67"},{"text":"25       Reducing the amount of aid granted for damage caused by a climatic phenomenon by 50%, pursuant to Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014, in a situation where, first, that phenomenon is not among the statistically most frequent climatic risks in the Member State or region concerned and, se …","paragraph_id":"para_68"},{"text":"26       In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the first and second questions is that Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that aid intended to compensate an SME active in primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which ca …","paragraph_id":"para_69"},{"text":"The third question","paragraph_id":"para_70"},{"text":"27       By its third question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that aid intended to compensate an SME active in primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which can be assimilate …","paragraph_id":"para_71"},{"text":"28       It follows from paragraph 21 above that Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 merely sets out the two conditions which must be satisfied by the insurance taken out by the beneficiary of aid granted under that article if that aid is not to be reduced by 50%, in accordance with that provision.","paragraph_id":"para_72"},{"text":"29       Thus, the wording of Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 does not, in itself, make it possible to determine whether, before reducing aid in accordance with that provision, the competent national authorities are required to verify whether, having regard to the insurance available on the …","paragraph_id":"para_73"},{"text":"30       In that regard, as is apparent from paragraph 24 above, the objective of the reduction provided for in that provision is to encourage SMEs active in primary agricultural production to take out insurance covering the climatic risks to which they are statistically most exposed, in order to reduce their economic dependence on agricultural aid granted under compensation schemes for damage caused by adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to a natural disaster.","paragraph_id":"para_74"},{"text":"31       In the context of good risk and crisis management, taking out insurance satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 forms part of the reasonable efforts which may legitimately be required of SMEs active in the primary agricultural sector in order to minimi …","paragraph_id":"para_75"},{"text":"32       However, as the Advocate General observed, in essence, in points 28 and 29 of his Opinion, such a consequence cannot be imposed in the exceptional case where insurance meeting the requirements of Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 is unavailable on the relevant market. In that case, th …","paragraph_id":"para_76"},{"text":"33       It follows that aid granted under Article 25 of Regulation No 702/2014 should not be reduced in accordance with paragraph 9 of that article where it is established that, in the light of the offer available on the relevant insurance market, the beneficiary of the aid was not able to take out …","paragraph_id":"para_77"},{"text":"34       In that regard, it must be stated, first, that that interpretation of Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 is not contrary to the requirement for a uniform interpretation of that provision. As the Advocate General stated, in essence, in point 33 of his Opinion, that interpretation ensures that the reduction of aid applied under that provision is done on the basis of an objective criterion and in accordance with the requirement of good risk and crisis management.","paragraph_id":"para_78"},{"text":"35       Secondly, there is nothing to suggest that that interpretation would be liable to give rise to distortions of competition in the European Union’s primary agricultural sector. On the contrary, the fact that aid granted under Article 25 of Regulation No 702/2014 does not have to be reduced in …","paragraph_id":"para_79"},{"text":"36       In the present case, it is apparent from the order for reference that, in Belgium, the most frequent climatic risk is hail and that, at the time of the events which gave rise to the dispute in the main proceedings, insurance cover against that risk was indeed available on the Belgian insura …","paragraph_id":"para_80"},{"text":"37       It is for the referring court to ascertain whether, in the light of all the information available to it, it can be established that, in view of the insurance available on the relevant insurance market, the applicants in the main proceedings were indeed unable to take out insurance satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014.","paragraph_id":"para_81"},{"text":"38       In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the third question is that Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that aid intended to compensate an SME active in primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which can be assimil …","paragraph_id":"para_82"},{"text":"Costs","paragraph_id":"para_83"},{"text":"39       Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the referring court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. Costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs of those parties, are not recoverable.","paragraph_id":"para_84"},{"text":"On those grounds, the Court (Sixth Chamber) hereby rules:","paragraph_id":"para_85"},{"text":"1.       Article 25(9) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 of 25 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 [TFEU]","paragraph_id":"para_86"},{"text":"must be interpreted as meaning that aid intended to compensate a small or medium sized enterprise (SME) active in primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which can be assimilated to a natural disaster must be reduced by 50% where that SME is not insured against …","paragraph_id":"para_87"},{"text":"2.       Article 25(9) of Regulation No 702/2014","paragraph_id":"para_88"},{"text":"must be interpreted as meaning that aid intended to compensate an SME active in primary agricultural production for damage caused by an adverse climatic event which can be assimilated to a natural disaster must not be reduced by 50% where that SME was not able to take out insurance satisfying the conditions of that provision for the type of production in which it is engaged, having regard to the insurance available on the relevant insurance market.","paragraph_id":"para_89"},{"text":"[Signatures]","paragraph_id":"para_90"},{"text":"*       Language of the case: French.","paragraph_id":"para_91"},{"text":"i       The names of the present cases are fictitious names. They do not correspond to the real names of any of the parties to the proceedings.","paragraph_id":"para_92"}],"word_count":4735,"cites":["C-52/25","C-53/25","C-117/24"],"cited_by":[],"sha256":"30d850e38e7c7baba80475f965ea0c1da9acd7a104e1df80657cb4eac4cd6b0c","source_url":"https://publications.europa.eu/resource/celex/62025CJ0052","fetched_at":"2026-10-02T08:09:52.442+00:00","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/ai/judgments/eu/m-l-c-52-25","risk_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25","relations_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25","changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/changes","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/agent?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25","verification_scope":{"stored_hash_is_source_verification":false,"official_source_comparison":"not_performed","legal_review":"not_assessed"},"decision_object":{"schema_version":"1","object_id":"decision:eu:m-l-c-52-25","judgment_class":"E","operative_part":"not_in_register","cites_count":3,"word_count":4735,"decision_url":null},"agent_links":{"agent_root":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent.json","agent_overview":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/rapid/agent/overview"}},"hash":"sha256:dc84900ece92494a03f31f45046b54abdb694cb9d4eb2ac8208173be6513e9de","version":"legal-2026-11-02","expires":"2026-11-03T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-11-02+legal-2026-11-02+2026-11-02T08:29:46","content_hash":"sha256:dc84900ece92494a03f31f45046b54abdb694cb9d4eb2ac8208173be6513e9de","revalidate_after":"2026-11-02T10:14:25.235Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25","follow":[{"rel":"risk","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25"},{"rel":"relations","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25"},{"rel":"agent","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/agent?id=eu:m-l-c-52-25"},{"rel":"changes","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu"}],"disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"},"access_class":"public","access_view":"public","freshness":{"freshness_class":"stable","as_of":"2026-11-02T09:14:25.403Z","valid_for":604800,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu%3Am-l-c-52-25&view=full","note":"Oföränderligt objekt med hash. Får cachas länge.","tokens":8369}}