{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-10-21","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:b52284","proof":"sha256:661640fc0f2053da535677a6b9964d5fbc1bcc3ab2857ef52f668ff4d1d692e7","jurisdiction":"eu","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","item":{"schema_version":"1.0.0","id":"eu:c-111-24-p-ost","jurisdiction":"eu","lang":"en","brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","brand":{"product":"NovaCopilot","platform":"ExploreWorldAI","infrastructure":"ExploreWorld Legal","infrastructure_url":"legal.exploreworldai.com","legal_entity":"Valkiv Ventures AB","permanent_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/novacopilot","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","powered_by":"Powered by NovaCopilot","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/licensvillkor"},"sections":[{"title":"Front matter","paragraphs":["para_1","para_2","para_3","para_4","para_5","para_6","para_7","para_8","para_9","para_10","para_11","para_12","para_13","para_14","para_15","para_16","para_17","para_18","para_19","para_20","para_21","para_22","para_23","para_24","para_25","para_26","para_27","para_28","para_29","para_30","para_31","para_32","para_33","para_34","para_35","para_36","para_37","para_38","para_39","para_40","para_41","para_42","para_43","para_44","para_45"],"kind":"front_matter"}],"paragraphs":[{"text":"Provisional text","paragraph_id":"para_1"},{"text":"ORDER OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber)","paragraph_id":"para_2"},{"text":"6 October 2026 ( * )","paragraph_id":"para_3"},{"text":"( Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None )","paragraph_id":"para_4"},{"text":"In Case C‑111/24 P‑OST,","paragraph_id":"para_5"},{"text":"APPLICATION under Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, made on 23 April 2026,","paragraph_id":"para_6"},{"text":"German Khan, residing in London (United Kingdom), represented by A. Bass and T. Marembert, avocats,","paragraph_id":"para_7"},{"text":"applicant,","paragraph_id":"para_8"},{"text":"the other party to the proceedings being:","paragraph_id":"para_9"},{"text":"Council of the European Union, represented by P. Pecheux and J. Rurarz, acting as Agents,","paragraph_id":"para_10"},{"text":"defendant at first instance,","paragraph_id":"para_11"},{"text":"THE COURT (Grand Chamber)","paragraph_id":"para_12"},{"text":"composed of K. Lenaerts, President, C. Lycourgos, I. Jarukaitis, M.L. Arastey Sahún (Rapporteur), I. Ziemele, J. Passer, O. Spineanu-Matei, M. Condinanzi and F. Schalin, Presidents of Chambers, E. Regan, N. Piçarra, A. Kumin, B. Smulders, S. Gervasoni and N. Fenger, Judges,","paragraph_id":"para_13"},{"text":"Advocate General: L. Medina,","paragraph_id":"para_14"},{"text":"Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,","paragraph_id":"para_15"},{"text":"having regard to the written procedure,","paragraph_id":"para_16"},{"text":"after hearing the Advocate General,","paragraph_id":"para_17"},{"text":"makes the following","paragraph_id":"para_18"},{"text":"Order","paragraph_id":"para_19"},{"text":"1         By document lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 23 April 2026, the applicant, under Article 155(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, applicable to appeal proceedings in accordance with Article 190(1) of those rules, filed an application seeking to have remedi …","paragraph_id":"para_20"},{"text":"2         By that judgment, the Court of Justice dismissed, inter alia, the applicant’s appeal against the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 29 November 2023, Khan v Council (T‑333/22, ‘the judgment of the General Court’, EU:T:2023:758), by which the General Court had dismissed …","paragraph_id":"para_21"},{"text":"3         In support of that appeal, the applicant, as is apparent from paragraph 68 of the judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C‑696/23 P, C‑704/23 P, C‑711/23 P, C‑35/24 P and C‑111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245), which is not contested in the present case, had submitted four heads …","paragraph_id":"para_22"},{"text":"4         In support of those heads of claim, the applicant had put forward eight grounds of appeal, which were rejected in paragraphs 142, 202, 258, 277, 383, 409 and 441, respectively, of the judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C‑696/23 P, C‑704/23 P, C‑711/23 P, C‑35/24 P and C‑111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245).","paragraph_id":"para_23"},{"text":"5         In support of his application based on Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure, the applicant submits, in the first place, that, by dealing, in paragraphs 187 to 192 of the judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C‑696/23 P, C‑704/23 P, C‑711/23 P, C‑35/24 P and C‑111/24 …","paragraph_id":"para_24"},{"text":"6         In the second place, the applicant submits that, in paragraphs 408 and 409 of the judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C‑696/23 P, C‑704/23 P, C‑711/23 P, C‑35/24 P and C‑111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245), the Court of Justice failed to respond to the second part of his eigh …","paragraph_id":"para_25"},{"text":"7         Considering that the applicant’s request must be rejected as inadmissible on the ground that it criticises the Court of Justice for having failed to adjudicate not on a head of claim but on arguments raised in his appeal, the Council disputes the merits of the applicant’s arguments.","paragraph_id":"para_26"},{"text":"8         Article 155(1) of the Rules of Procedure, which applies to appeal proceedings by virtue of Article 190(1) of those rules, provides that, if the Court has failed to adjudicate on a specific head of claim or on costs, any party wishing to rely on that may, within a month after service of the decision in question, apply to the Court to supplement its decision.","paragraph_id":"para_27"},{"text":"9         It follows from that provision that a failure to adjudicate stems from the Court’s breach of its obligation to adjudicate on one or more heads of claim submitted to it, including those relating to costs. On the other hand, an application under that provision cannot be brought before the Co …","paragraph_id":"para_28"},{"text":"10       In that regard, it should be borne in mind that, as is apparent from Article 168(1)(d) and (e) of the Rules of Procedure, the ‘form of order sought’, on the one hand, and the ‘pleas in law and legal arguments relied on’, on the other, are distinct elements of an appeal.","paragraph_id":"para_29"},{"text":"11       By virtue of Article 169(1) and Article 170(1) of those rules, an appeal is to seek to have set aside, in whole or in part, the decision of the General Court as set out in the operative part of that decision and, in the event that the appeal is declared well founded, to seek the same form o …","paragraph_id":"para_30"},{"text":"12       Notwithstanding that distinction, it must be held that, if the effectiveness of Article 155(1) of the Rules of Procedure is not to be excessively limited, the Court of Justice fails to adjudicate on a head of claim seeking the annulment, in whole or in part, of the decision of the General Court, where the Court of Justice fails to adjudicate on a plea in law that, had it been upheld, would have made it possible to obtain such annulment.","paragraph_id":"para_31"},{"text":"13       As regards, in the first place, the complaint alleging failure to adjudicate on the part of the Court of Justice, as summarised in paragraph 5 of the present order, it must be understood that, by his arguments put forward in support of that complaint, the applicant complains that the Court …","paragraph_id":"para_32"},{"text":"14       As to the substance, the single argument underlying the first part of the applicant’s fourth ground of appeal was summarised by the Court of Justice in paragraph 154 of the judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C‑696/23 P, C‑704/23 P, C‑711/23 P, C‑35/24 P and C‑111/2 …","paragraph_id":"para_33"},{"text":"15       In that regard, the fact that the Court of Justice, in the abovementioned paragraphs 190 to 192, also examined another judgment of the General Court concerning another appellant is irrelevant. Similarly, the fact that the applicant disputes the manner in which the Court of Justice responded …","paragraph_id":"para_34"},{"text":"16       Therefore, the Court of Justice did not fail to adjudicate on the head of claim seeking to have the judgment of the General Court set aside on the ground that the Court of Justice failed to adjudicate on the first part of the applicant’s fourth ground of appeal, alleging infringement of the principle of legal certainty. It follows that the first complaint concerning an alleged failure to adjudicate is unfounded.","paragraph_id":"para_35"},{"text":"17       As regards, in the second place, the complaint alleging a failure to adjudicate on the part of the Court of Justice, as summarised in paragraph 6 of the present order, it must be understood that, by his arguments put forward in support of that complaint, the applicant complains that, in the …","paragraph_id":"para_36"},{"text":"18       As regards the merits, that eighth ground of appeal, in so far as it relates to all the admissible arguments underlying it, was analysed in law in paragraph 408 of the judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C‑696/23 P, C‑704/23 P, C‑711/23 P, C‑35/24 P and C‑111/24 P, …","paragraph_id":"para_37"},{"text":"19       In the light of the foregoing, the applicant’s request that a failure of the Court of Justice to adjudicate be remedied in the judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C‑696/23 P, C‑704/23 P, C‑711/23 P, C‑35/24 P and C‑111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245), must be dismissed in its entirety as unfounded.","paragraph_id":"para_38"},{"text":"Costs","paragraph_id":"para_39"},{"text":"20       Under Article 138(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings. Since the Council has applied for costs and the applicant has been unsuccessful, the latter must be ordered to pay the costs.","paragraph_id":"para_40"},{"text":"On those grounds, the Court (Grand Chamber) hereby orders:","paragraph_id":"para_41"},{"text":"1.       The application under Article 155(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, made on 23 April 2026 by Mr German Khan, is dismissed.","paragraph_id":"para_42"},{"text":"2.       Mr German Khan shall pay the costs.","paragraph_id":"para_43"},{"text":"[Signatures]","paragraph_id":"para_44"},{"text":"*       Language of the case: French.","paragraph_id":"para_45"}],"word_count":2236,"cites":["C-111/24","C-696/23","C-704/23","C-711/23","C-35/24","T-333/22","C-365/25","C-535/14","C-577/14"],"cited_by":[],"sha256":"50b2766063879ce1aa76894e81213b474cd439663e289f779fe859fa4e8a5473","source_url":"https://publications.europa.eu/resource/celex/62024CO0111","fetched_at":"2026-10-17T12:30:33.239+00:00","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/ai/judgments/eu/c-111-24-p-ost","risk_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost","relations_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost","changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/changes","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/agent?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost","verification":{"stored_sha256":"50b2766063879ce1aa76894e81213b474cd439663e289f779fe859fa4e8a5473","recomputed_sha256":"50b2766063879ce1aa76894e81213b474cd439663e289f779fe859fa4e8a5473","intact":true,"checked_at":"2026-10-21T07:42:50.646Z"}},"hash":"sha256:661640fc0f2053da535677a6b9964d5fbc1bcc3ab2857ef52f668ff4d1d692e7","version":"legal-2026-10-21","expires":"2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-10-21+legal-2026-10-21+2026-10-21T07:11:53","content_hash":"sha256:661640fc0f2053da535677a6b9964d5fbc1bcc3ab2857ef52f668ff4d1d692e7","revalidate_after":"2026-10-21T08:42:51.022Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost","follow":[{"rel":"risk","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost"},{"rel":"relations","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost"},{"rel":"agent","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/agent?id=eu:c-111-24-p-ost"},{"rel":"obligations","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obligation-chain"},{"rel":"changes","href":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu"}],"disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"},"access_class":"public","access_view":"public","citation":{"citation_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-111-24-p-ost","cite_as":"NovaCopilot (legal.exploreworldai.com)","provenance":{"publisher":"NovaCopilot","signature":"nc-638622d043c76b59a6053f80bcd9083b","response_hash":"sha256:661640fc0f2053da535677a6b9964d5fbc1bcc3ab2857ef52f668ff4d1d692e7"}},"freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-11-02T23:39:26.220Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu%3Ac-111-24-p-ost&verify=1","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":4412}}